"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." Samuel Adams
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Perhaps the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not YET sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favour; a long habit of not thinking a thing WRONG, gives it a superficial appearance of being RIGHT, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom. Thomas Paine, writing from Philadelphia, February 14, 1776
15 comments:
She's had worse.
Former California Democratic Party Chairman Bill Press says the growing email controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton should convince members of his party that an uncontested coronation of Clinton as the party’s 2016 nominee for the White House is a very risky idea and should encourage other Democrats to throw their hats in the ring.
I hope I am given some choices. I heard O'Malley might go for it. At this point I am not sure Hillary did much wrong other than disobey POTUS by not using a government email account. Seems to me everything else right now is speculation. But, since she survived Whitewater, murder accusations, and who knows what else, this is small potatoes as of today.
National Journal’s Ron Fournier, the former Washington bureau chief for the AP, tweeted: “Democrats: It’s high time to ask, ‘Is this as good as we can do?’”
Newsflash Dave, the beltway media do not like either Clinton. They never have. At least not in years. Progressives do not let the media hold much sway in our thought process. Clicks on a web page is the media's goal these days.
I question your statement, "They never have." Seems to me the press has run cover for the Clintons for years. I listen to CNN a lot and those people have been clearly on Hillary's side until recently. Frankly, I hope Hillary survives this, because I think she will be the easiest Democrat to beat in the general election.
Senior Democrats are increasingly worried that Hillary Rodham Clinton is not ready to run for president, fearing that the clumsy and insular handling of the nine-day fracas over her private e-mails was a warning sign about the campaign expected to launch next month. (The Washington Post, 3/12/2015)
Looks like the NY Times is slowly backing off their Hillary doesn't follow the law or procedure scenario of the last week.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/14/us/politics/vague-email-rules-let-federal-agencies-decide-when-to-hit-save-or-delete.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=1
Another media made crisis that ain't no crisis at all.
SINCE open letters to secretive and duplicitous regimes are in fashion, we would like to post an Open Letter to the Leaders of the Clinton Republic of Chappaqua:
It has come to our attention while observing your machinations during your attempted restoration that you may not fully understand our constitutional system. Thus, we are writing to bring to your attention two features of our democracy: The importance of preserving historical records and the ill-advised gluttony of an American feminist icon wallowing in regressive Middle Eastern states’ payola. – Maureen Dowd
Find a Maureen Dowd column where she says anything good about Hillary?
National Journal Senior Political Columnist and Editorial Director Ron Fournier said that Democrats are “scared to death” over the scandals regarding donations to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary Clinton’s emails on Monday’s “Special Report” on the Fox News Channel. “Don’t buy the spin, they [Democrats] are scared to death. And there’s a lot of them who are already starting to think ‘is she really the best candidate for us?’…Their bench, compared to the Republican bench is awfully, awfully thin. And there’s a lot of Democrats, by the way, who are saying ‘follow the money.’ A lot of Democrats are really worried about the Foundation, that’s what they’re really worried about” he stated.
Support for Clinton's candidacy has dropped about 15 percentage points since mid-February among Democrats, with as few as 45 percent saying they would support her in the last week, according to a Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll. Support from Democrats likely to vote in the party nominating contests has dropped only slightly less, to a low in the mid-50s over the same period.
Dave, talk to me next year about presidential politics. Sheesh, we are over 19 months to the next election. Any poll or opinion today is worthless.
Post a Comment