"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds." Samuel Adams

Friday, February 20, 2009

Hundreds show up to protest global warming!



7 comments:

Brian C. Caffrey said...

Beautiful! Their collective IQ exceeds that of Algore.

Bill said...

The marching morons

Dave said...

I posted this photo, partly because it's kinda funny, but also because it makes a point. The snowmen are protesting because they have a vested interest in the global warming phenomenon: if it actually happens, they are doomed. But they are protesting something that is only a perceived threat to their existence; it's not an actual threat because it isn't real--it's a fabrication. The point is, I'm all for protesting whatever the government is doing that affects the future existence of my family and my nation. But I want to be sure we are protesting the right things. There is a lot of deception going on right now. For example, a headline yesterday said that Obama is considering a 40% stake in CitiBank. Today the headline is that Bernanke is opposed to nationalizing banks. Later I heard Bernanke on the radio and what he said is that he defines nationalization as the government taking over a business, zeroing out the stockholders, and basically running the business from Washington. So maybe Bernanke didn't contradict what the president was considering. He's just defining nationalization in its fullest manifestation rather than in its various levels of manifestation. Maybe he actually has no problem at all with the government holding a 40% stake. My point is, what is meant by nationalizing a business? Obviously it means different things to different people, depending on what they're trying to get away with. This means, we cannot protest the government nationalizing businesses, we must be more specific. If we say we oppose nationaization, Obama and Bernanke will simply say, "Yeh, we oppose that too." They are too good at playing with words. We need to be very careful how we frame our arguements. Eventually the snowmen will realize this.

Brian C. Caffrey said...

Well, to me, this all means that we need to assume that these people are either flat-out lying or attempting to deceive. It is incumbent on us to translate their double-talk and be in a position to protest their true intentions.

Dave said...

That is exactly my point. And it doesn't really matter whether they are intentionally lying or trying to deceive. If we accuse them of intentionally lying, we set ourselves up to be accused of being everyone else's judge or being holier-than-thou, which the liberals love to accuse conservatives of. Instead, we simply translate what they're saying and then protest the reality of it. This is why we need people who can articulate our values clearly and powerfully.

Dave said...

Here is the AP story on Bernanke's comments about nationalizing Citigroup. Listen to his silver tongued manipulation of language: "Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday again spurned speculation that the government may nationalize Citigroup or other big banks. When asked about Citigroup during a House Financial Services Committee hearing, Bernanke said nationalization "is when the government seizes the bank and zeros out the shareholders and begins to manage and run the bank. And, we don't plan anything like that." But Bernanke told lawmakers it is possible the government could end up with a much bigger ownership stake in Citigroup Inc. or other banks."

Notice how he defines nationalization as a total takeover and says that we won't do that. Then he admits that we may very well do what Obama is saying, which is also nationalizing, albeit at a lesser level. He wants to be able to nationalize banks without admitting that's what we're doing. Of course, no one in Congress challenges his definition. This is sinister.

Brian C. Caffrey said...

They are Stalinists. And who set the table for all of this insanity? The great George W. Bush. He's made it so much easier for the socialists to ram their program through. And that traitor has put us in the position where we have to deal with the argument by the socialists, "Well, Bush did it, too; Bush started it." The treachery that Bush wrought on conservatives is as great as any visited upon his erstwhile supporters by any American politician. Greater than Nixon. It disgusts and galls me.