Is darkness coming?

This past Sunday, 140 million Pakistanis were plunged into darkness when the nations power grid was crippled by jihadists. Oh well, so what! Pakistan is thousands of miles away, and the Pakistanis are not exactly our best friends anyway. But we need to be aware that the same thing can happen here. Many reports have indicated that there are already hundreds of "sleeper cells" in America just waiting to launch their attacks. In addition, the president recently announced that 10,000 Syrian refugees will be resettled in America this year. The number could reach 75,000 within five years. Have all of these people been thoroughly vetted? How can we be sure that more jihadists are not entering American under the cover of refugee status? The fact is, we cannot be sure. This may be a good time to look into getting your own personal windmill.

Wake up! black America

Margaret Sanger and her murderous Planned Parenthood regime are gloriously succeeding. In 1939 she wrote: "The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members" (Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts). Of course, exterminating the "Negro population" was exactly what Margaret Sanger wanted. Today, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), for every 1000 black babies born, 483 are aborted. This means that nearly one-third of all black pregnancies end in abortion. I realize it's above the president's pay grade to say whether or not life had begun for these aborted babies, but as the nations first "black president," he ought to be ashamed of himself for standing idly by while Ms. Sanger's genocide of the black community rages on.

It's all politics!

September 11, 2012: Muslim jihadists storm American outpost in Libya because of video defaming Muhammad. Result: 4 dead Americans, including an ambassador. Response: condemn the video. January 7, 2015: Muslim jihadists storm Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris because of cartoons defaming Muhammad. Result: 12 dead Frenchmen. Response: condemn the terrorists and 4 million people march in support of freedom of speech.

What's the difference? Why two diametrically opposed responses? Why was the guy that made the video demonized while the newspaper cartoonists are heralded as heroes? Politics! Pure, unadulterated politics! And to underline the hypocrisy of it all: the video story wasn't even true.